INTERNAL AD / MIKE'S AMAZING BOOKS / PDFS
Comes with full access link to all 30 PDF books and pay-to-view content!
Be sure to submit E-mail there. (Allow a few hours to receive)
August 6, 2024
David Keith wants to spray a pollutant into the sky to block some sunlight. He says the benefits would outweigh the danger.
Rebuttal By
As the White Hat Slimes (along with other military-controlled media) continues to play its necessary game of showing the center-left elements of the public just how batshit crazy the extreme Left has become, it's difficult to determine sometimes if a given story is a Q-planted "wake up call" -- or, just cunning commies and loony libtards being cunning commie and loony libtards. For that reason, with regard to this particular front page Sunday article, "The Editorial Board" of The New York Times will take a pass on definitively calling this is a Q op. It could very well be a movie scene; but it could also be an actual case of the Left unintentionally caricaturing itself. Either way, the preposterous nature of the bold proposal being offered by Harvard "scientist" David Keith should be laughably self-evident, even to some libtards.
.
From the article:
.
"David Keith was a graduate student in 1991 when a volcano erupted in the Philippines, sending a cloud of ash toward the edge of space.
.Seventeen million tons of sulfur dioxide (17, eh? Hmmmm? That's the letter Q. Just sayin'.) released from Mount Pinatubo spread across the stratosphere, reflecting some of the sun’s energy away from Earth. The result was a drop in average temperatures in the Northern Hemisphere by roughly one degree Fahrenheit in the year that followed.
Today, Dr. Keith cites that event as validation of an idea that has become his life’s work: He believes that by intentionally releasing sulfur dioxide into the stratosphere, it would be possible to lower temperatures worldwide, blunting global warming. Such radical interventions are increasingly being taken seriously as the effects of climate change grow more intense." * Absolutely crazy, and quite possibly, dangerous! Or, "crazy" like a fox, perhaps? Maybe.
Today, Dr. Keith cites that event as validation of an idea that has become his life’s work: He believes that by intentionally releasing sulfur dioxide into the stratosphere, it would be possible to lower temperatures worldwide, blunting global warming. Such radical interventions are increasingly being taken seriously as the effects of climate change grow more intense." * Absolutely crazy, and quite possibly, dangerous! Or, "crazy" like a fox, perhaps? Maybe.
1. Kooky Keith's scheme amounts to simulating the cooling effect caused by the volcanic spewing of sulfur dioxide. // 3. These people are sick. Read Climate Bogeyman, by yours truly.
What's most interesting, in an unusual sense, about the lengthy article itself is that the distinguished dissenting voices quoted therein are actually in the majority, with crackpot Professor Keith in a minority of one. These scientists make a passionate case against this idea proposed by Keith and Covid Con-Man Bill Gates (who, by the way, is dead, we do believe). So much so, that any libtard reading this article would come away thinking: "The consensus among scientists is that this idea is way too risky." One example, of several, from the article:
.
“I compare stratospheric solar geoengineering with opiates,” he (Dr. Frank Keutsch) said. “They only treat the symptom and not the actual cause. You can get addicted to it if you don’t actually address the cause. In addition, like any painkiller, you’re going to have side effects. And then there are withdrawal symptoms, and that’s termination shock.”
.Another:
.
“This is a really dangerous path to go down,” said Beatrice Rindevall, the chairwoman of the Swedish Society for Nature Conservation, which opposed the experiment. “It could shock the climate system, could alter hydrological cycles and could exacerbate extreme weather and climate instability.”
.
It really does appear that the White Hat Slimes set up this geo-engineering obscenity as a Straw Man to be knocked down not by us "uneducated" Trump-supporting "Climate Deniers" -- but rather, by a "consensus" of "respectable" environmentalist scientists. It's worth mentioning that Q and Commander Trump did also target the Climate Change HOAX, the EPA and the Paris Accord. Such a prominently featured takedown of the Gates FrankenClimate scheme would therefore certainly "fit" the pattern.
Q Post 489 / January 7, 2018
US taxpayers are paying for it all.Paris accord = scam (trillions) Red Cross = scam (billions)Foreign Aid = scam (trillions)WAR = scam (trillions)………on…and….on……..
Q Post 1241 // April 23, 2018
How do you ‘squeeze’ funds out of the US?Threat to humanity?Environment push?Think PARIS accord.Who audits / tracks the funneled money?Define kickback. Define slush fund.EPA.
UK Guardian
Not too long ago, this sort of criminal insanity was being taken seriously. Not any more.
Boobus Americanus 1: I read in the New York Times today about a Harvard scientist who wants to pump sulfur dioxide into the atmosphere in order to cool the planet. It appears that the consensus among his peers is that the dangers of this idea would outweigh any potential benefits.
.Boobus Americanus 2: That sounds a little nutty to me. * St Sugar: The whole Climate Con is nutty, Boobuss!
.Editor: The Paris deal is dead, the EPA has been neutered, and geo-engineering schemes are going nowhere. All glory to the Q operation and its frontman, Donald Trump.
* Comes with full access link to all 30 PDF books and pay-to-view content.
Be sure to submit E-mail there. (Allow a few hours to receive)
Please share this article -- copy & paste the heading and link below to your social media pages and emails.
Comments(All comments are read, but not always responded to)