INTERNAL AD / MIKE'S AMAZING BOOKS / PDFS
NEW AT AMAZON!
Comes with full access link to all 30 PDF books and pay-to-view content!
Be sure to submit your E-mail there! (Allow a few hours to receive)
August 19, 2024
NY Times: Deploying on U.S. Soil: How Trump Would Use Soldiers Against Riots, Crime and Migrants
The former president’s vision of using the military to enforce the law domestically would carry profound implications for civil liberties.
By Charlie Savage, Jonathan Swan and Maggie Haberman
Rebuttal By
Prominently featured on the Sunday front page of the White Hat Times, very long in length, and surprisingly (or not surprisingly, these days) objective and neutral in tone, this big article does more than just telegraph Commander Trump's coming military takeover (a replay, in essence) -- it actually explains for readers how the legal protocols, already in place, would support such an action, both at the border and in the streets.
.
The trio of reporters who put this legal summary together includes the despicable Maggie "Maggot" Haberman -- a Deep State target named by both Q and Trump. This suggests that her persona has been hijacked and turned into "Maggot Haberman." Though the article contains a modicum of necessary alarmism for "street cred" purposes, its overall prep-work purpose is obvious. Let's dive in and decypher.
Maggot Haberman -- targeted by Q in 6 different posts -- objectively and rationally (her ?!) explains how Commander Trump can roll out a military crackdown by strictly legal means.
From the Article: In his first term in office, Mr. Trump never realized his expansive vision of using troops to enforce the law on U.S. soil. But as he has sought a return to power, he has made clear that he intends to use the military for a range of domestic law enforcement purposes, including patrolling the border, suppressing protests that he deems to have turned into riots and even fighting crime in big cities run by Democrats.
Analysis: This is psychological prep-work, presented dispassionately and in exact alignment with Q-ism.
.
From the Article: An internal email from a group closely aligned with Mr. Trump, obtained by The Times, shows that, privately, the group was also exploring using troops to “stop riots” by protesters.
Analysis: As a result of Executive Order 13818 and various other secret crackdowns and power grabs-- all of which enabled the seizure of the bosses and their funding -- the "spontaneous" assemblage of Marxist street mobs is no longer possible. So then, who would actually be "rioting" to protest Trump? Answer: White Hats pretending to be Marxists (think anti-Israel protests). This too aligns with Q "prophecy," from as far back as 2017, regarding the overt deployment of the federalized National Guard and military.
.
From the Article: While governors have latitude to use their states’ National Guards to respond to civil disorder or major disasters, a post-Civil War law called the Posse Comitatus Act generally makes it a crime to use regular federal troops for domestic policing purposes.
Analysis: Amazing that the article should mention the fact that the 1878 Posse Comitatus Act prohibits the use of active duty personnel to execute laws. This was one the very first points of skepticism that I had when first coming across the Q posts in early 2018. But thanks to the information specifically provided to us by subsequent Q posts and data being circulated by various other "anons", we "Q-Tards" soon learned that, in certain circumstances, the President can indeed deploy the military on US soil -- legally bypassing Posse Comitatus with something called the Insurrection Act.
.
From the Article: However, an 1807 law called the Insurrection Act creates an exception to that (Posse Comitatus) ban. It grants presidents the emergency power to use federal troops on domestic soil to restore law and order when they believe a situation warrants it. Those federal troops could either be regular active-duty military or state National Guard soldiers the federal government has assumed control over.
Analysis: That paragraph could have been written by Q himself! In regards to the legality of Trump bypassing Posse Comitatus, what the White Hat Slimes -- whose reporting soon spreads virally throughout the rest of the MSM -- is telling the captive subjects of Normiedom is simply this: "Oh yes he can! Get ready for it!"
.
From the Article: Because D.C. is a federal enclave, not a state, it has no governor, and its National Guard always reports to the Pentagon.
Analysis: And this explains the legality of how DC was taken over on January 6th and remained occupied ever since. Normies don't know this, but they will when the takeover of DC is "replayed."
.
Long before "Maggot Haberman" had ever uttered such legal terms, our friend Q was telling us about the two little known Acts from the 1800s which her and her co-writers specifically mentioned in Sunday's front page story.
With the most dangerous Deep State players having been arrested / executed by now, we eagerly anticipate the after-the-fact replay for the benefit of the bewildered subjects of Normiedom. This "Great Reenactment" essentially involves the false flag framing of a phantom Deep State for imaginary crimes committed in the present -- which will then "break the ice" for the disclosure of the real crimes committed in the past.
.
Among the staged events to be witnessed and exposed in real time may be an outrageously brazen "stolen election" (a replay from 2020), an overturning of the "stolen election" by a pro-Trump Qongress or the Supreme Quort" (as we had expected in 2020-2021), Marxist rioting over Trump's "return" (White Hat "Marxists," that is), Trump's invocation of the Insurrection Act on "Day 1." (a replay from 2021, only this time, done overtly and with public support).
.
That scenario fits Q "prophecy," and it also fits this very convenient "prep-work" article. Stay tuned.
If indeed the script has "Kamala" (or someone else) "winning" -- that individual will never make it to Inauguration Day as the "storm" will finally be unleashed (replayed).
Boobus Americanus 1: I read in the New York Times today that Trump would actually have legal grounds to deploy the military on US soil. Something called the Insurrection Act supercedes something called Posse Comitatus.
Boobus Americanus 2: That's sscary. ***St. Sugar: Only for the frickin' bad guyss, Boobuss. Sincere idiotss like you and your watercooler buddy are ssafe.
Editor: Although, some mandatory re-education classes wouldn't hurt him either.
Boobus Americanus 2: That's sscary. ***St. Sugar: Only for the frickin' bad guyss, Boobuss. Sincere idiotss like you and your watercooler buddy are ssafe.
Editor: Although, some mandatory re-education classes wouldn't hurt him either.
* Comes with full access link to all 31 PDF books and pay-to-view content.
Be sure to submit E-mail there. (Allow a few hours to receive)
NEW AT AMAZON!
Please share this article -- copy & paste the heading and link below to your social media pages and emails.
Trump to Replay the Insurrection Act https://www.realnewsandhistory.com/anyt-08-19-24
Comments(All comments are read, but not always responded to)