Comes with full access link to all 35 PDF books and pay-to-view content!
Be sure to submit your E-mail there! (Allow a few hours to receive)
February 22, 2026 *** * Our "almost daily" E-mails sometimes land in spam.
G-mail users, also check "Promotions" Bin or "All Mail" -- Contact us if E-mails ever suddenly stop.
** Please support and share my work on your social media and by email. See link-sharing box near bottom of page. ***
With a 6-3 Ruling, Independence Is Declared. The court’s rejection of President Trump’s tariffs program is the latest in a series of clashes between him and Chief Justice John G. Roberts Jr.
Rebuttal by
The Roberts / "Roberts "Supreme Court" -- or, as "The Editorial Board" of The Anti-New York Times prefers to call it -- The Supreme Quort -- has, in recent years, delivered one shockingly bold and delightful pro-MAGA ruling after another, after another, after another. There was the historic reversal of the 1973 Roe vs Wade baby-killing mandate, the pro-school prayer decision, the overturning of the ban on "bump stocks" (an attachment which enhances the performance of a semi-automatic rifle), rulings which significantly curtailed the economy-wrecking tyrannical power of the EPA as well as all other regulatory agencies, and further rulings effectively barring anti-White discrimination with regards to college admissions and, by virtual extension, job hiring. What an amazing run of "winning" it has been. And now, all of sudden, we are to believe that this imaginary Quort has reverted to its old Deep State self? What gives?
.
From the front page feature article appearing in the Q York Times:
.
"Mr. Trump has had an extraordinarily successful run before the Supreme Court. That came to a sudden, jolting halt on Friday, when Chief Justice John G. Roberts Jr., writing for six members of the court, roundly rejected Mr. Trump’s signature tariffs program. ..... It amounted to a declaration of independence."
.
.
Trump has already announced his intention to ignore the "ruling" and impose tariffs as he sees fit -- creating "chaos and uncertainty" now in global markets, so they say. So, what might be the purpose of this latest hyped-up fight scene in "The Movie?"
In recent years, the Supreme Quort had consistently been "Hard Right" MAGA. Why the sudden drama-filled "rebellion" against Trump?
1 & 2. Trump has had Roberts / "Roberts" in the Q "crosshairs" all along. / 3. Trump used the occasion of the ruling to raise tariffs even further, as he is about to announce a $2000 per taxpayer tariff dividend.
This showdown with Chief Justice Roberts / "Roberts" could make for some interesting drama Tuesday evening, when Roberts and other justices will be in attendance at Trump’s staged "State of the Union" address, sitting in their black robes in the front row. Mr. Trump may have provided a preview of his remarks, stating at a press conference that he was "ashamed" of some of the justices: “They’re very unpatriotic and disloyal to our Constitution.” he said. Trump also made a cryptic reference to "foreign influence" having been involved with the decision. "It's my opinion that the court has been swayed by foreign interests," he stated. When asked by a reporter to elaborate, Trump replied, "You'll find out." If shown to be the case, that would certainly constitute treason.
.
Now, about Chief Justice Roberts / "Roberts." This center-right jurist -- owing to his surprising protection of clearly unconstitutional initiatives during the Obongo years -- has long been suspected of being under some sort of blackmail. Coincidentally, the name "John Roberts" appears on one of the Jeffrey Epstein flight logs. Yes, the full name itself is surely more common than most other names, but....... given the other contextual details and Trump's comment about "foreign influence," .... well, it's more than enough to make any self-respecting Q Tard go "hmmmmmm."
.
Very interesting. Let's see what happens.
1 & 2. Is the John Roberts on the Epstein flight log the same John Roberts who saved Obamacare? Who else could it be? // 3. Trump knows something.
-
* Editor's Note: The only other "John Roberts" of any notoriety is White Hat newsman John Roberts of FOX News, who -- unlike Supreme Court Chief Justice Roberts -- made it a point to post on Twitter that he is absolutely NOT the John Roberts in question. (here)
Boobus Americanus 1: I read in today's New York Times that the Supreme Court shot down Trump's tariffs.
. Boobus Americanus 2: What a mess this will create. How will the tariffs be reimbursed now?
.
Sugar: Just sshut the &^%$ up and watch the frickin' movie, Boobuss! . Editor: It is not by coincidence that this decision and the subsequent media hype occurs just before the State of the Union spectacle -- a production of White Hat Productions.
* Comes with full access link to all 35 PDF books and pay-to-view content.
Be sure to submit E-mail there. (Allow a few hours to receive)
.
Please share this article -- copy & paste the heading and link below to your social media pages and emails.
Comments(All comments are read, but not always responded to)