Comes with full access link to all 35 PDF books and pay-to-view content!
Be sure to submit your E-mail there! (Allow a few hours to receive)
March 02, 2026 *** * Our "almost daily" E-mails sometimes land in spam.
G-mail users, also check "Promotions" Bin or "All Mail" -- Contact us if E-mails ever suddenly stop.
** Please support and share my work on your social media and by email. See link-sharing box near bottom of page. ***
-
NY Times: For Trump, the Iran Attack Is the Ultimate War of Choice
There was no immediate threat from Iran. But the president saw a chance to push a weakened government over the edge, and is betting he can spark a popular uprising.
Rebuttal by
Even the most astute student of Q-ology cannot decode or interpret the meaning behind every single line of every single one of the approximately 5000 posts. Complicating the process is the stated fact that Q, by his own admission, put out some posts for disinformation / psych war purposes. Whereas some "Anons" feel this strange need to definitively explain and translate everything into a meaningful assessment (even it means reckless conjecturing because it sounds interesting), "The Editorial Board" of The Anti-New York Times is not ashamed to simply say "I don't know," from time to time. And so it was with certain posts clearly forecasting the overthrow of the Iranian regime, as well as ongoing events. We didn't understand the motive then, and we don't understand this latest film scene now. Hopefully, this will be linked to an Israeli blackmail plot related to Epstein Island (make believe), but that's only a hopeful hypothesis.
.
Sorry to let you down, boys & girls. But until the "Wag the Dog" FAKE "war" plays itself out, it's not even worth getting tied up in mental and emotional knots over its meaning. All we can do is "stay in our lane" of knowledge while reviewing some basic points.
.
1. The "US-Israeli" killing of Supreme Leader Khamenei (already 86 and in poor health) was fake.
2. The Shitty Little State (Israel) is out of business and under control of the QSA -- not the other way around.3. Many Iranians supported Khamenei and the government; secularists and Persians do not.
4. The head-covering law was not enforced. Many women chose not to cover their heads in public.
5. Peaceful Iran posed no threat to any nation, and its internal politics are not our concern.
6. Christian and Jewish minorities in Iran are respected.
7. Whatever the final outcome of this latest movie scene is, understand that it was already worked out among the QSA, Russia, China and Iran a long time ago.
8. Scary scenarios and "casulaties" which may come out of this "war" will be stage managed.
9. The end of this scene, and the movie in general, will provide the answer as to the "WHY?" of it all.
.
.
That's the best we can do at this time. Sorry.
The unfolding events make for a good "teachable moment" for a review of the ancient as well as more recent external factors which caused the lingering internal divide within "Iran" -- Farsi for "Land of the Aryans."
.
* 633-651: The Arab conquest of Persia resulted in the fall of their empire
* Persia's monotheistic religion of Zoroastrianism was gradually replaced by Islam
* While the political entity of the Persian Empire ceased to exist, Persian identity still remains strong in the cultural, linguistic, and ethnic sense
.
Fast forward to the 1970s -- concerned over the "westernization" and secularization of Iran (a cultural shift which included shortening skirts and the growing "tolerance" for homosexuality) Islamists plotted to overthrow the Shah (King) of Iran. Marxists and their libtard followers also wanted to depose the Shah; as did the Globalist administration of President Jimmy Carter, and his handler, Zbigniew Brzezinski. To that end, the NWO undermined the Shah, expecting that a new Leftist "democratic" regime would gain the upper hand over both the Islamists and the Shah. Instead, the western-aided 1979 revolution toppled the Shah (who was preferred by the Persians), with the Muslims putting the Marxists and Libtards out of business as well. By 1980, the USA was already waging proxy war against the new Iranian government whose installation it had enabled.
.
Conservative Muslims, "modern" Muslims, proud Persians, western wannabee libtards, and even some well-treated Christian and Jewish minorities --- all under one political roof. That's Iran, "in a nutshell." So maybe, the purpose of this scene is to ultimately install a new governing system -- a "happy medium" -- that would be more palatable to all Iranians?
.
Let's see what happens.
1. The ancient Persian Empire at its peak. // 2. In terms of culture and sexualization, 1970s Iran was mimicking western culture. The Shah of Iran had legalized on-demand abortion and "tolerated" homosexuality. Understandably, this dangerously degenerative trend deeply upset many Muslims. // 3. When the revolution succeeded in 1979, the Muslims pushed aside the Marxist & Libtarded rebels. Many of them (as well as Shah loyalists) then fled to western nations.
They say he was (is) "evil?"
The future Shah? Not a chance!
Boobus Americanus 1: I read in today's New York Times that this Iran war is a war of Trump's choosing which really may not have been necessary.
. Boobus Americanus 2: I'm tellin' ya, Trump is trying to divert attention from the Epstein scandal.
.
Sugar: Yess! Yes!! Trump is under blackmail by the Mosssad! (he he he he he). Editor: Saving Israel for last?
* Comes with full access link to all 35 PDF books and pay-to-view content.
Be sure to submit E-mail there. (Allow a few hours to receive)
.
Please share this article -- copy & paste the heading and link below to your social media pages and emails.
Comments(All comments are read, but not always responded to)