August 4, 2026
* Real News & History / ANYT receives and welcomes the support of honest and peace-loving people from all races, religions and nationalities.
*** The REAL Israel Lobby is Also Dead ***
Between April 2022 and the end of last month, AIPAC funded 109 TV and digital ads in American elections, according to a New York Times analysis.
INY Times: Inside the Spending of AIPAC, One of the U.S.'s Largest Super PACs
*
NY Times: AIPAC Wants Democrats to Back Israel. Instead, They’re Turning on AIPAC.
*
Yahoo: New York Times Raises Eyebrows by Referring to AIPAC as 'Hard-Right' Pro-Israel Group
Democrats have increasingly vowed not to accept donations from AIPAC, which historically gave to both Democrats and Republicans who are supportive of Israel and its alliance with the U.S.
Of the 1,717 proofs confirming the validity of the Q Operation and its iconic Post # 916 from 2018 ("We are saving Israel for last) --none are more compelling that the relentless "Mainstream Media" attacks now being launched upon the once untouchable Shitty Little State and its American Lobby, AIPAC (American Israel Public Affairs Committee). For one who has been red-pilled since the 1990s, witnessing the Jewish-owned "paper of record" leading the assault on Israel and AIPAC amounts to a "pinch me, I'm dreaming" experience -- until one understands that there is nothing dreamy about the Q Operation. It's real!
.
The Times does not directly "attack," AIPAC, but rather, exposes its enormous influence (now make-believe play acted) as well as the sneaky way in which AIPAC now uses a front group, which it founded in 2022, called "United Democracy Project." The UDP runs ads in favor of a preferred candidate - or against a targeted candidate -- by focusing on some other economic or social issue but without mentioning Israel! In addition to exposing the trick -- by tagging AIPAC as "hard right," the "paper of record" adds still more negative stink to the group whose assets were, in our estimation, seized a long time ago by authority of Trump's Executive Orders 13848 & 13818. Few Democrats are inclined to support a "hard right" anything! With the rise and rise of the overtly Marxist Demoqrats (all psyop actors) AIPAC (also all psyop actors) is no longer "bipartisan" and hence, no longer feared by anyone in government, academia or the press.
.
Keep your friends close. Keep your enemies closer!
A pair of powerful Executive Orders (both twice-renewed by "Joe Biden!") enabled the Q Operation to seize the persons and the assets ("donations") of anyone involved with "Human Rights Abuse" (Israel), "Corruption" (Israel / AIPAC) and "Foreign Election Interference" (Israel / AIPAC).
Trump: "Israel had the strongest lobby in Congress of anything or body, or of any company or corporation or state that I’ve ever seen. Today, it doesn’t have that strong a lobby. It’s amazing. They had total control over Congress, and now they don’t, you know, I’m a little surprised to see that."
Inside the Crisis at the Anti-Defamation League
New York Magazine
Goy oh goy have we come a long way since journalist Michael Massing of the niche Left magazine "The Nation," wrote in a June 10, 2002 article title, The Israel Lobby:."Why the blackout? For one thing, reporting on these groups is not easy. AIPAC’s power makes potential sources reluctant to discuss the organization on the record, and employees who leave it usually sign pledges of silence..The main obstacle to covering these groups is fear. Jewish organizations are quick to detect bias in the coverage of the Middle East, and quick to complain about it. As the Forward observed in late April, “rooting out perceived anti-Israel bias in the media has become for many American Jews the most direct and emotional outlet for connecting with the conflict 6,000 miles away.” Recently, an estimated 1,000 subscribers to the Los Angeles Times suspended home delivery for a day to protest what they considered the paper’s pro-Palestinian coverage. The Chicago Tribune, the Minneapolis Star Tribune, the Philadelphia Inquirer and the Miami Herald have all been hit by similar protests, and NPR has received thousands of e-mails complaining about its reports from the Middle East.
Do such protests have an effect? Consider the recent experience of the New York Times. On May 6 the paper ran two photographs of a pro-Israel parade in Manhattan. Both showed the parade in the background and anti-Israel protesters prominently in the foreground. The paper, which for weeks has been threatened with a boycott by Jewish readers, was deluged with protests. On May 7 the Times ran an abject apology. That caused much consternation in the newsroom, with some reporters and editors feeling that the paper had buckled before an influential constituency. “It’s very intimidating,” said a correspondent at another large daily who is familiar with the incident. Newspapers, he added, are “afraid” of organizations like AIPAC. . “The pressure from these groups is relentless. Editors would just as soon not touch them.” . . To the ever-diminishing Black Pilled remnant of the readership who still insist that the Q operation was a Mossad "psyop" (rolling eyes) -- please explain how it came to pass that the most intimidating political / journalistic / academic pressure groups in America history (AIPAC & ADL) are now the powerless objects of scorn and butt of jokes from sources Left, Center & Right? Take all of the time you need. (answer below, in case you didn't see the first 1700 times)
Do such protests have an effect? Consider the recent experience of the New York Times. On May 6 the paper ran two photographs of a pro-Israel parade in Manhattan. Both showed the parade in the background and anti-Israel protesters prominently in the foreground. The paper, which for weeks has been threatened with a boycott by Jewish readers, was deluged with protests. On May 7 the Times ran an abject apology. That caused much consternation in the newsroom, with some reporters and editors feeling that the paper had buckled before an influential constituency. “It’s very intimidating,” said a correspondent at another large daily who is familiar with the incident. Newspapers, he added, are “afraid” of organizations like AIPAC. . “The pressure from these groups is relentless. Editors would just as soon not touch them.” . . To the ever-diminishing Black Pilled remnant of the readership who still insist that the Q operation was a Mossad "psyop" (rolling eyes) -- please explain how it came to pass that the most intimidating political / journalistic / academic pressure groups in America history (AIPAC & ADL) are now the powerless objects of scorn and butt of jokes from sources Left, Center & Right? Take all of the time you need. (answer below, in case you didn't see the first 1700 times)
1. In 2002, Michael Massing seemed totally Black Pilled about the scope of AIPAC's power to influence politics and journalism. // 2. Today, hundreds of MSM articles and cartoons routinely mock and attack "Bibi," AIPAC and the SLS. // 3. Slowly but surely -- and by Q's design -- MAGAdonians are joining Democrats in their disdain for the SLS.
Boobus Americanus 1: I read in the New York Times today that the Israel Lobby is losing the Democrats.
Boobus Americanus 2: Indeed. Even many Trump supporters have had enough of Bibi's act.*St. Sugar: Let'ss hope Bibi don't frickin' bomb uss, Boobuss. (he he he he he) Editor: The 25th anniversary of 9/11 would be a purrrrfect day -- still to soon though.
Boobus Americanus 2: Indeed. Even many Trump supporters have had enough of Bibi's act.*St. Sugar: Let'ss hope Bibi don't frickin' bomb uss, Boobuss. (he he he he he) Editor: The 25th anniversary of 9/11 would be a purrrrfect day -- still to soon though.
Please share this article -- copy & paste the heading and link below to your social media pages and emails.
Comments(All comments are read, but not always responded to)