* Sign up for your FREE Report & FREE Updates at the very bottom of any page.
"How to Respond to an Anti-Conspiracy Theorist"
October 30, 2023
The vote was the first piece of legislation considered under Speaker Mike Johnson, Republican of Louisiana
Trump Vows to Reject Gazan Refugees * House Declares Solidarity With Israel in First Legislation Under New Speaker
The resolution pledges to support Israel with whatever it needs as it fights Hamas. It passed overwhelmingly, but a small group of mostly Democratic holdouts remained.
Rebuttal By
Incited by operatives of the cynical Black Pill Society, the Sunshine Patriots are already pulling the stop cord on the Trump Train. "Mike, Mike! The new Speaker 's very first legislative act was to stand with Israel in its genocidal war against the Palestinians! -- Mike, Mike! Trump is also standing with Israel and refusing to take Gazan refugees!" -- "Mike! Mike! Give up on Zion Don! You're starting to sound like controlled opposition now" (rolling eyes)
Relax, boys and girls. There's is nothing to see here.
First of all, and I realize and empathetically understand that even the most astute of the generally astute subscription base of The Anti-New York Times still has a very hard time grasping the reality of the current military Continuity of Government illusion operation that is now running worldwide. The real Joe Biden is dead; the real Bibi Satanyahoo is either dead or locked up; the US Congress isn't even in session; and the "war" in the Middle East is a scripted "Wag the Dog" controlled information scenario consisting of controlled demolitions, crisis actors (on both sides), fake blood, theatrical dust and various other props. That being the case, then what is there to actually "stand with" or against? To state, with emphasis that one "stands with Israel" is about as significant as saying that "I stand with Darth Vader against the Jedi Knights" of Star Wars fame ---- or "I stand with the Joker in his battle against Batman."
It's all a movie anyway --- so why get worked up over the fact that Trump and Johnson (and the entire Republican Party) are "standing with" the bad guys? That being said, let's analyze the meaning of "I stand with Israel" as if this war, and the threat of its possible spread, are real. Whichever scenario you choose to believe, this will end poorly for the Netanyahu / "Netanyahu" Likud bastards -- and ultimately result in a secure sovereign state for the Palestinians.
If the war is just a Wag-the-Dog movie (as demonstrated by countless staged images of crisis actors and fake blood) then boldly stating "I Stand With Israel" is as harmless as "standing with" the villainous Darth Vader or the Joker.
Let us refer to that philosophical masterpiece of theater, The Godfather, Part 1 -- for this imperfect, but good enough anology. A powerful Mafia boss named Barzini (analogous to Trump and the White Hats) is using a lesser Mafia boss named Tataglia (analogous to foreign leaders and the American radical Left) to wage a secret war against another powerful Mafia boss named Corleone. (analogous to Satanyahoo and Israel Firsters). While the Corleone Family fights back against Tataglia, Barzini sits back pretending to be neutral and even friendly with Corleone. As the film unfolds, Corleone finally comes to realize that Tataglia was just a proxy, and utters that famous line: "I didn't realize until this day, that it was Barzini all along."
You see, boys and girls, Barzini Trump (and his sub capo, Speaker Mike Johnson), by keeping their hands clean and "standing with Israel" are able to pacify many of the vocal and wealthy "usual suspects" and their multi-million voter legions of Evangelical ZioTards. Meanwhile, the "far Left" pro-Palestinian faction of the Demonrat Party (now under White Hat control) takes the heat not only from Israel Firster Jews, but even more significantly, the scores of millions of American boobs whose understanding of these matters amounts only to: "Israel good -- Muslims bad -- Holocaust never again."
As Jewish normies and Israel-loving Gentile normies grow disenchanted with the "far Left" over Israel, Barzini-Trump and the Republican Party welcome many of them into their ranks. Now, here's the kicker. There will be no payback given to the multitudes of Israel worshippers other than the continued repetition of "I stand with Israel." As long as the USA never fights another war or manages a proxy war for Israel (we won't) -- and as long as the Palestinians ultimately get a fair deal (they will) --- then what the bloody hell does the "I stand with Israel" platitude even mean?
So, whether one believes the unfolding drama to be a movie or to be real --- there is NOTHING to fret over unless and until the United States goes to war / world war for the sake of Greater Israel. Wake me up (and feel free to insult me) if and when that ever happens. (and it won't -- in spite of any coming "scare event" which may portend otherwise).
1. Standing alone, the Anti-New York Times has been saying for 5 years now that the "Radical Left" Ladies-of-Color that lead up the Congressional clique known as "The Squad" are White Hat operatives tasked with driving voters out of the Party. // 2. The Left's war on Israel is controlled by Trump (Barzini) and the White Hats. Israel's image gets further damaged while "frightened" Jew and gullible goy voters leave a Demonrat Party which refuses to condemn "The Squad."
Boobus Americanus 1: I read in the New York Times today that the new Speaker's very first act was to put forth a resolution proclaiming America's support for Israel.
Boobus Americanus 2: That's good. Support for our greatest ally and the only democracy in the Middle East should not be a partisan issue.
*
St Sugar: That'ss right, Boobuss. We musst all sstand with the sshitty little sstate -- Trump good! Squad bad!
Editor: Well played, baby girl. Baby girl.
Please share this article and help the site grow -- copy & paste its address to your social media pages and emails.
RealNewsAndHistory.com/anyt-10-30-23
Comments
(All comments are read, but not always responded to)
(All comments are read, but not always responded to)