November 02, 2026
*** China vs Taiwan: The Historical Context ***
NY Times: Opinion | When Will Xi Jinping Move on Taiwan?
The question of Taiwan looms over China’s relationship with the rest of the world.
This latest chapter in the long-running (77 years!) China vs Taiwan story provides us with a good "teachable moment" ™ for addressing an interesting yet mostly forgotten historical question- namely: what is this controversy about "one China" vs "two Chinas" all about anyway?
.
Like so many other of the world's hot spots and problem areas, this dangerous situation had been engineered by the Globalists -- specifically, traitors such as Hiroshima Harry Truman's respective Secretaries of State (fronting for the notorious Council on Foreign Relations) -- George Marshall and Dean Acheson. Providing important intellectual cover for their treason was CFR "scholar," Owen Lattimore (now known to have been a secret Communist), while The New York Slimes and The Washington Compost deceitfully twisted the Chinese Civil War as one of Marxist Mao Tse Tung good -- Fascist Chiang Kai Shek bad.
.During World War II, Chiang's American-allied Nationalist government and Mao's Soviet-backed Communist rebels put aside their differences (Chiang was actually under threat) and focused on fighting the peace-seeking Japanese. Unbeknown to Chiang, Franklin Demono Rosenfeld and the gang of Red moles who accompanied him to the historic Yalta Conference in February of 1945 were already planning to betray him and hand disputed Manchurian ports -- which Chiang thought China would get from Japan -- over to Joe Stalin's jurisdiction upon completion of the war. The "price" that Stalin had to pay to get his foot in Manchuria was to break his non-aggression treaty with Japan, and join the war in Asia no later than 90 days after the end of the war in Europe, which was rapidly approaching. The deal also stipulated that the US would supply hundreds of boatloads of additional arms to help the Soviet effort in Asia.
.
True to his word (heavy on the sarcasm there) Stalin joined the war exactly 90 days after Victory in Europe Day, on August 9, 1945 -- the same day as the 2nd atomic bomb was dropped on Japan, an honorable already defeated nation that has been trying to negotiate a surrender! Faced with the dreadful prospect of limitless firebombs raining down upon their defenseless cities AND a Soviet declaration of war, Japan had no choice but to surrender unconditionally. Soon afterwards, the Soviets opened up their strategic Manchurian ports and supplied free American-made arms to Mao's boys. Captured Japanese munitions depots were also turned over to the Reds.
At the 1943 Cairo Conference, FDR & Churchill promised Chiang that China would get Manchuria after the final defeat of Japan. // 2. But at the 1945 Yalta Conference in Crimea (Soviet Union), the two slimeballs, behind Chiang's back, agreed to hand oversight of Manchuria's key ports to "Uncle Joe" Stalin. // 3. In August of 1945, Mao (l) and Chiang (r), who had set aside their fight to join forces against Japan, toast to their victory. Poor Chiang had no idea about the colossal betrayal which his former "allies" were preparing for him.
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Ad:
Help Real News & History AND Protect Your Net Worth.
Verified and Vetted -- Proud to Purchase from and Promote:
Clicking on ad takes you to my dedicated Landing Page with a Free Report (But finish this article first!)
The years between 1945-1949 witnessed further betrayals of Chiang by the US State Department. Under the protective cover of NY Slimes & DC Compost puff-pieces about the "agrarian reformer" Mao and the "corrupt" Chiang, the Globalists / Communists at State tilted the playing field towards Mao. Thanks to a US arms embargo, the Nationalists began to run low on ammunition as the Reds remained Soviet-supplied. In 1948, Congress voted $125 million in military aid to Chiang. The Communist-infested Truman administration responded by delaying the aid with bureaucratic "red tape" for 9 months. During that time, China collapsed and the demoralized Nationalists escaped across the Taiwan Strait to the Chinese island of Formosa, which became known as Taiwan, or "free China."
.In a 1950 speech, the great Senator Joseph McCarthy (R-WI) minced no words in talking about the tragedy that had just befallen China. Speaking of the scum in the Truman's State Department, McCarthy stated:
.
"Communists and queers have sold 400 million Asiatic people into atheistic slavery, and have the American people in a hypnotic trance, headed blindly toward the same precipice."
.
Did St. Joe nail that prediction, or what?!
.Chaing's Taiwan became free and prosperous as Mao's mainland descended into genocide and remained relatively backward for decades to come. And that, dear reader, is why many (not all) of the folks in Taiwan say that there are "two Chinas," while the mainland Chinese insist that there is only "one China." From our perspective, though we are sympathetic to "One China," this is a matter for the Chinese people to resolve, not America. Given the ironic fact that the modern incarnation of "Communist China" is now so pro-business, pro-tradition, pro-religion and pro-peace that Chiang would actually like it, while Mao wouldn't even recognize it, the "two Chinas" should reunite with Taiwan retaining a degree of autonomy -- as is the case with Tibet and Hong Kong. America's interference in Asia has done enough harm.
-
From Dave at News Treason:
Clicking on ad takes you to my dedicated Landing Page. Get your Free Report.
Boobus Americanus 1: I read in the New York Times today that the new Taiwanese President opposes reunification with mainland China.
.
Boobus Americanus 2: I never quite understood how this one-China / two-China controversy came about.
*
St Sugar: It's very ssimple, Boobuss Boyss. The ussual ssuspectss have f***d-up every region that they have ever touched around the world.
.
Editor: Darn straight, Sugar baby! And not by accident either.
Please share this article -- copy & paste the heading and link below to your social media pages and emails.
Comments(All comments are read, but not always responded to)